Quote:
Originally Posted by crockett
They weren't terrorist? You mean they weren't terrorist because they were fighting the soviets. They had however kidnapped and killed a US ambassador to Afghan but they weren't terrorist.. LoL
Funny how when they fought against the US enemy they were freedom fighters but when they fought against the US they were terrorist. They were always Islamist extremist, in fact the CIA even used that to get more jihadist into the fight against the Soviets from other Arab countries. Do you even know what Mujahideen means? It means the people doing jihad..
We propped them up and funded them and then almost soon as the Soviets leave we invade Iraq and then wonder why the Islamist extremist attacked us.. Suddenly then it's ok to call them terrorist.. You act as if there were some great amount of time in which Islamist came into power.. Umm hello that's who we funded.
Somehow you claim once again that I have changed the subject, yet once again you fail to answer.. The question I've asked you twice. Seems like you are the guy that is dodging the topic..
|
I guess you don't have a fucking clue again, what a surprise!
A mujahid is one who strives or struggles on behalf of Islam; mujahideen is the plural of the same word. The word mujahid is an Arabic participle drawn from the same root as the Arabic word jihad, to strive or struggle.
Fuck, how many times do you have to prove how fucking stupid you are?
__________________
Carbon is not the problem, it makes up 0.041% of our atmosphere , 95% of that is from Volcanos and decomposing plants and stuff. So people in the US are responsible for 13% of the carbon in the atmosphere which 95% is not from Humans, like cars and trucks and stuff and they want to spend trillions to fix it while Solar Panel plants are powered by coal plants
think about that