Quote:
Originally posted by sexeducation
SexEducation.com is a global magazine of sexual intercourse. It has always been a magazine of intercourse. The dictionary defines intercourse as "social discussion" and "sexual copulation".
|
I notice that you like to repeat the same things over and over, without any relevance to the current line of discussion. Why is that?
Quote:
There is no stolen content on my website.
I quote public made statements - whether those statements are one dimensional (text), two dimensional (graphics) or three dimensional (video).
|
First, a nitpick point: Text, graphics, and video are all two-dimensional.
Next, there is stolen content. If you want to claim that you are using the freedom of the press, and fair use, you would still be required to inform your audience of the source of the images you are using. You do not, you use them as site content, not for review or comment purposes. That makes it theft.
Quote:
There is no stolen content - AND - there is no illegal content in the free countries of the world which have freedom of the press.
Dad@
|
There is illegal content. Any sexually explicit photo on a website is illegal unless 2257 custodian of records information is provided on that website. You are breaking the law.
There is something more I need to say, and I am not sure quite how to say it. Here goes...
While it is true that many of us are disguested with you, and it causes bias in our posts to and about you, that is not all that is going on here. Some of us are genuinely trying to educate you about the laws that you are breaking. Every time one of us tries to explain copyright law, or 2257, or a number of other things, you are dismissing us too quickly. We are making valid points, and you *really are* in violation of a number of laws. I encourage you to open your eyes, and listen to the advice you are being given. Just because you can rationalize a behavior does not mean that the law sees it the same way.