Quote:
Originally posted by sexeducation
I am not suggesting that Parents show minors explicit sexual content. On my website you can turn the graphics off - and you can block specific videos. You can also block specific articles which you find inappropriate.
|
You run a site that, by default, has a good deal of explicit content on it. You encourage parents to show that site to their children. Sure, they could change their browser settings, but you're still effectively encouraging minors to look at porn. Another rationalization.
Quote:
There is content on my website (articles like "Let Teens Have Sex - The arguement of why Teenagers should be allowed to have sex." which in my opinion every teenager on the planet should read. Who would guess that a magazine of intercourse/discussion would publish opinions.
|
Fine. Maybe your site has some interesting articles. If you want to show them to children, you should replace your pornographic images with anatomical drawings and less explicit material. You can't have it both ways. Another dodge.
Quote:
Leave it to the "professionals" is a cop out of responsibility. It's like saying - "only the schools ..."
50% of women never have an orgasm.
70% of men complain of premature ejaculation.
Obviously - the professionals are failing - when there is no need for either.
Dad@
|
So, the sexual education of children should be left to... A sex offended who likes the children he shows porn to to call him "Dad"? Sorry, I don't buy it.