View Single Post
Old 07-07-2003, 01:01 PM  
Scootermuze
Confirmed User
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Posts: 4,513
All of the mud slingin in the world isn't gonna help a thing with this Acacia stuff..
especially with the way they're entering into it..
You can mark my word, unless the judge jumps right on top of the issues, it's not gonna be about 'patent infringement' .. it's gonna be about porn..

These lawyers are gonna turn this into fiasco with, "Our children are being put in harms way by being able to watch porn movies using our patented process" .. and anything else that will keep the real issue as far back on the burner as possible..

Anything that will make the jury believe they are right..

The words "porn", "adult Sites", or anything else that has to do with this industry needs to be disallowed as reference in the court because it has nothing to do with the content being streamed... it's all to do with whether or not the streams are being sent through a patented process..
I just hope the defense drives this home with the judge and enters such a motion, or it's gonna be the L.A. police dept. on trial instead of O.J. again... so to speak..
Scootermuze is offline   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote