Quote:
Originally Posted by CyberSEO
It's not a disorder. It's just not normal (unnatural), because it's against the meaning of life. Do you know the meaning of life (ANY LIFE from paramecia to a human being)? It's as simple as this: transfer your DNA to the next generation and die. This can't be done by means of homosexual act. So homosexuality is not normal according to the NATURE.
|
The good old "it's against nature" argument
Let's break it down so you realize how utterly stupid that dumb shit is.
Your premise is that, for sex to be "normal" (natural) it has to happen between a man and a woman so that their DNA can be passed on, right?
So what about when a man and a woman have recreational sex and they use protection? Wouldn't THAT be against nature, since they're interrupting a natural process?
Or what about when a man has anal sex with a woman, isn't THAT against nature since a baby obviously can't be produced that way?
What about blowjobs? You ever had your dick sucked? Because if you did, then by your own definition you had "abnormal sex". You fucking deviant
So by your argument any man/woman that has ever:
Used artificial devices to avoid pregnancy (the pill/condoms/pull out) are abnormal since they're interfering with nature.
Has had anal sex are abnormal.
Has had oral sex are abnormal.
Has had recreational sex without any kind of thought for producing offspring are abnormal.
Now it can't be argued that lesbian/homosexual sex cannot produce biological offspring.
But a lot of heterosexual people can't have biological offspring either because they're infertile, so riddle me this: are they then "abnormal" since by your definition the ability to produce biological offspring is what defines a person as "normal"?
