Quote:
Originally Posted by BFT3K
In reality, all of the companies are putting more and more resources toward dirty energy sources that were never before accessible ? or never before considered acceptable. With limited regulation and oversight, and with plenty of subsidies and tax breaks, all of the companies discussed here are upping their oil and natural gas antes by drilling deeper than ever into the oceans (including Exxon in the Russian Arctic), increasing operations in the Canadian tar sands, dramatically expanding hydraulic fracking in ever-more parts of the U.S. and the world, and ? with the exception of ConocoPhillips ? hunting and drilling for oil in Iraq and/or Kurdistan. It all makes perfect sense, if you go by what Exxon vice president J.S. Simon told Congress in 2008: "The pursuit of alternative fuels must not detract from the development of oil and gas."
Read more: http://www.rollingstone.com/politics...#ixzz2qyr9DkvG |
Agreed, it's easier for them to make money off us with those technologies, I want to see more research in hydrogen powered cars. On a submarine, we separated O2 from the Hydrogen in the sea water. We stored the O2 to breathe and pumped the Hydrogen over board. The same tech could be used to power a car, the tech is several decades old.
__________________
Carbon is not the problem, it makes up 0.041% of our atmosphere , 95% of that is from Volcanos and decomposing plants and stuff. So people in the US are responsible for 13% of the carbon in the atmosphere which 95% is not from Humans, like cars and trucks and stuff and they want to spend trillions to fix it while Solar Panel plants are powered by coal plants
think about that