Quote:
Originally posted by sexeducation
GothWeb: I appreciate the help ... I truly do.
If I have been "blinded" by the cursing ... I appologize.
Assuming you are correct ... that 2257 refers to "ALL websites" ... then I would say that 2257 is unconstitional as it forces a magazine to reveal it's sources. If 2257 only refers to "pornographic websites" I can see that ... but I have no intention of revealing the majoritiy of sources for "textual content". Now with regards to graphic content ... I do try to to state the sources ... there may be some old articles I do not ... but I will endevour as a result of recent feed back to be more aware of this need....regardless of whether it is "the law" or not as it makes my website more acceptable to the general adult community. I will work on this issue with expeditious due dilligence (after my other job ..)
CAVEAT: It is the continuous drop of AVS suppliers as a result of similar "charges/lies" that keeps my website broken.
And time in these groups ...
|
You really need a fucking lawyer, you have NO fucking idea.. You host in the states, but you will have a host no longer.