View Single Post
Old 03-06-2014, 01:57 PM  
InfoGuy
80/20 Rule
 
InfoGuy's Avatar
 
Industry Role:
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: Los Angeles
Posts: 3,051
Quote:
Originally Posted by PornoMonster View Post
http://www.cnn.com/2014/03/05/us/mas...html?hpt=hp_t2


Massachusetts' highest court ruled Wednesday that it is not illegal to secretly photograph underneath a person's clothing -- a practice known as "upskirting" -- prompting one prosecutor to call for a revision of state law.

The high court ruled that the practice did not violate the law because the women who were photographed while riding Boston public transportation were not nude or partially nude.

"A female passenger on a MBTA trolley who is wearing a skirt, dress, or the like covering these parts of her body is not a person who is 'partially nude,' no matter what is or is not underneath the skirt by way of underwear or other clothing," wrote Justice Margot Botsford of the state Supreme Judicial Court.
It's interesting that the judge was a woman.
InfoGuy is offline   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote