Quote:
Originally Posted by AdultDesigns
Read the letter...
"For someone who subscribes to a site like Facial Abuse I want to commend you for spending the $200 a week your parents send you every week for living expenses wisely"
Doesn't add up to what you said "Apparently the Duke student who "outed" Belle Knox spends $1,000 a month on porn sites". Reading is not your strong side eh?
|
First. . .Read the Headline of the NY Post article:
STUDENT WHO OUTED BELLE KNOX HAS A $1K-a-MONTH PORN HABIT
Next. . .Read from the second paragraph of the article:
"Big-mouthed frat boy Thomas Bagley shells out $1,000 a month as a subscriber to hard-core porn site FacialAbuse.com, according to Mike Kulich, CEO of Monarchy Distribution."
So from that, it CERTAINLY does add up to what I said. . ."Apparently the Duke student who "outed" Belle Knox spends $1,000 a month on porn sites".
If I based my finding on a factually incorrect headline and article, then that's called detrimental reliance.
So you are wrong. Reading is my "strong side"
And your "strong side" is being a douchebag. GFY
