Quote:
Originally Posted by SBJ
while you are right you read it right.. you didn't read the actual letter that was wrote.. This article was poorly written to grab views. Read the link I posted a few posts up and you will see that.
|
The wording of the letter was written ambiguously, but you could certainly read it to mean that he was being commended for spending his weekly budget $200 wisely - and that in addition to all of his regular expenses, he still had money to spend on FacialAbuse.com. And that's probably what the letter's author meant as you can't spend $1,000 a month on FacialAbuse.com
But I read the headline and NY Post article, and as you pointed out, I read it correctly.
I have no issue with you - just with the douchebag who questioned my reading abilities.