View Single Post
Old 03-14-2014, 10:16 PM  
galleryseek
Confirmed User
 
Industry Role:
Join Date: Mar 2002
Posts: 8,234
::insert my once in a random month post here::

I'm an anarchist/atheist, so me "sticking up" for westboro should be seen as a purely logical evaluation, not some biased Christian nut..

The Non-Aggression Principle (NAP) defined: The recognition that it's immoral to initiate or threaten the initiation of force against a person or their property. It's what we teach our children, "Don't hit, don't steal, don't threaten others."

Pretty simple universal shit right? The westboro aren't initiating or threatening the initiation of force against others, even though they're fucking bat shit insane and taking a chance of being killed.

So it's wrong for others (police/law enforcement, your family/friends, etc..) to do the same. I know, it's tough/convoluted/fucked up, but if you think the NAP has any relevance, you can't *initiate* or threaten the initiation of force against them. Use voluntary means instead to combat the problem of ignorance.

Last edited by galleryseek; 03-14-2014 at 10:19 PM..
galleryseek is offline   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote