Oh hell.. this is typical of GFY!!
We got the usual stupid asses making fine distinctions on some laws... we got the scum of the earth in sexeducation spouting his warped ideas on "educating" children... sheesh.. gimme a break!!
Read this and get it firmly placed into your thick sculls:
(a) sexeducation operates/ed a child porn site under the guise of "sex education".
(b) He has/had images that are clearly child porn under any standards. These include, for the benefit of the dim, images depicting anal sex with minors blah.
(c) He is a convicted child molester.
(d) There is a totally insignificant minor matter.. that of contravening section 2257.
(e) He has published images which he had no rights to use.
All of the above is NOT assumed - the details have been recorded but I am not gonna pander to the curiousity of idiots by publishing this and messing up some other action in progress.
Finally, if you still don't get it... give everyone a break and fuck off out of this business - it could do with a break from total idiots who generally think they can come on the net and seriously earn a living without a clue as to what it is about and "assume" everything, clog up boards with stupid one-liners and get in the way.
|