Quote:
Originally Posted by Robbie
Yeah, they are. So are the pics in every "glamor" shoot.
She's 46 years old. I think she looks better than most girls who are 26. Her body is definitely hot. And her face is beautiful in a milf-y style (not the teenager fresh young look, but a WOMAN look).
And again, why on Earth would anybody NOT photoshop this kind of a shoot as much as possible?
Whether the girl is 26 or 46, this kind of "soft" focus shoot is supposed to look exactly like that.
It's shot by photographers and edited by photo editors whose experience and talent are WAY above the paygrade of any of us GFY "experts".
And even looking at the paparazzi "bad" pics of her, it's easy to see that she's a beautiful woman who will turn heads when she enters a room.
It's stupid for people to put up an airbrushed photo of her on BayWatch in her 20's and put it side by side with an un-airbrushed photo of her in her 40's.
Hell, I'm a handsome devil right now. But I wouldn't want you to put up a pic of me in my mid-20's side-by-side with a pic of me now. Of COURSE I'm not gonna look like a young stud at my age.
Come to think of it...I didn't look like a young stud when I WAS young. lol
|
I know all magazines do that. But fuck all this pics looks so unnatural. They remind me cyborgs or cartoon heroes. Why not to do light touches instead of deep deep photoshop? They just make her look the way she would like to be(or they want her to be). All looks so fake - for me personally not even interesting to watch.