Quote:
Originally posted by Webby
Oh hell.. this is typical of GFY!!
We got the usual stupid asses making fine distinctions on some laws... we got the scum of the earth in sexeducation spouting his warped ideas on "educating" children... sheesh.. gimme a break!!
Read this and get it firmly placed into your thick sculls:
(a) sexeducation operates/ed a child porn site under the guise of "sex education".
(b) He has/had images that are clearly child porn under any standards. These include, for the benefit of the dim, images depicting anal sex with minors blah.
(c) He is a convicted child molester.
(d) There is a totally insignificant minor matter.. that of contravening section 2257.
(e) He has published images which he had no rights to use.
All of the above is NOT assumed - the details have been recorded but I am not gonna pander to the curiousity of idiots by publishing this and messing up some other action in progress.
Finally, if you still don't get it... give everyone a break and fuck off out of this business - it could do with a break from total idiots who generally think they can come on the net and seriously earn a living without a clue as to what it is about and "assume" everything, clog up boards with stupid one-liners and get in the way.
|
A) This is a complete fabrication - a complet lie.
I do not distribute child pornography.
I discuss how to shut those sites down.
I have been banned by Overture.com because I banned email addresses that end in ".RU" from getting memberships on my website because IMO - RUSSIA is the biggest distributor of child pornography.
When Overture.com came to review my website they declined my advertising campaign because I was openly against groups of people and quote to me in the email about the decline that I could not ban countries from getting a membership with SexEducation.com
B) That is just complete BULLSHIT. I do not have ANY NOT ONE GRAPHIC OF A MINOR HAVE SEX ON MY WEBSITE - NOT ONE.
I do have pictures of minors FULLY CLOTHED.
Some sitting beside their fathers ...
Some with AIDS sitting beside their mothers...
C) I HAVE NEVER BEEN CONVICTED, CHARGED, INTERVIEWED, OR EVEN ACCUSED OF CHILD MOLESTATION. THIS IS A COMPLETE UNFOUNDED AND LIBELOUS STATEMENT. YOU HAVE BEEN WARNED - REPEATEDLY - THAT THIS IS NOT TRUE.
D)I USED TO HAVE A 2257 statement on the homepage of my website - and I do have - the source - or can source - the most controversial graphics on the website. I am not stupid - I know which graphics are causing the "emotions" ... those graphics are from a website like BarelyLegal.com (example only) ... which had 2257 statements ...
E) A magazine has a right to quote publicly made statements.
There may be a few errors in quoting the source of those statements/graphics ... I will be more diligent in doing so in the future.
IN SUMMARY ...
You have believed lies and unfounded statements about me ("convicted") ... and you are continuing to make libelous statements which are clearly - wrong .. slanderous and are now causing financial loss and emotional harm.