So let's follow your logic through, so you're comparing these two:-
1. Child gets MMR vaccine
2. (Japan) Child gets two vaccines, given at the same time, one for Measles and one for Mumps.
And you're saying that because there is Autism in both scenarios then that means that MMR doesn't cause Autism. I hope you can see that this logic doesn't stand up to scrutiny as the scenario also exists that both can cause Autism. In both scenarios the child is given concurrent live infections.
If they really want to test this then we need to have a child who has no vaccines, but Big Pharma keep refusing to conduct that study.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Paully
The increase in autism and autistic spectrum disorders in this part of Yokohama displays the same increase over time seen in other parts of the world. Here, though, the increase occurred even when the MMR vaccine was withdrawn. This destroys any possible causative link between use of the vaccine and autism.
Perhaps the most important features of the study were that it comprehensively covered a population, and that the population was served by a special service testing children for developmental; disorders and using standard methods over the whole period. The quality and validity of the study is superlative, and the size good.
Whatever causes autism, it is not the MMR vaccine.
http://www.medicine.ox.ac.uk/bandoli...nes/noMMR.html |