Quote:
Originally Posted by robwod
mineistaken: No, I am saying that my first inclination if I see a problem is to deal with people I work with directly, and discreetly rather than running to a public board and making accusations.
Incidentally, I was just speaking to some other webmasters and wondered how long it take for someone to spin my thoughts on professionalism / professional courtesy to something negative. Only 21 minutes, thanks  |
It's either true or it's not. No one has damaged RUC yet. They have a chance to come in here and explain and show how it is a misunderstanding or how they will make it right. If they handle it right they could turn this into something positive. At least in my eyes.
This is part of what is wrong with this industry. No people should not have to shut up and take it when they are cheated. No someone should not have to get permission to post things like this. No someone does not owe it to the sponsor to ask for an explanation first. It's the sponsor's duty to check these things themselves first and others have a right to know about it. If a sponsor gets all bent out of shape over a legitimate occurrence like this then they aren't a good business in the first place. It's just like all the businesses bitching about Yelp reviews. Usually the ones bitching are the biggest scumbags. Good businesses get people to defend them and everyone knows they are good. In the same way good sponsors do not fear scrutiny.