Quote:
Originally Posted by Relentless
Wrong. People making accusations need to have proof first. That's why nobody is allowed to go around posting 'I'm pretty sure you are a rapist'
As for Yelp, I've been hired several times to answer bad reviews for companies. They aren't answering bad reviews because they are hard working business owners who care deeply about what yelp readers think. They are hiring me to answer Yelp reviews because paying me costs less than the amount they earn by combating negative reviews. It's simple cost/benefit analysis.
Money divided by clicks = value
The rest is just another GFY dog and pony show to smear brands that idiots will 'hate' without any factual reason to do so  |
He posted as a matter of fact what happened and what he sees. He seems to have proof. You just don't like the idea that he didn't ask JT for permission to post first.
Good businesses do not need people to manipulate Yelp. They have real customers who share positive experiences and these overshadow the bad ones. It's the same way with sponsors. If RUC is honest then it will come out as such. If they have something to hide then yes they might fear such scrutiny. To resort to scumbag tactics to silence it would only prove that they are a bad business.
$/click means little if you never actually get paid that money. It's also something you can't rely as much on when using a rev share model because a lot of your revenue is tied up in the future rebills. $/click as a metric has more value for PPS and short term campaigns. But not everyone uses that model. You ought to be able to understand this...