View Single Post
Old 04-16-2014, 03:42 AM  
NewNick
Confirmed User
 
NewNick's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Posts: 7,033
Quote:
Originally Posted by jscott View Post
RUC you have a really terrible attitude about this topic.

You get so defensive, and not even trying to understand the fact that you are IN FACT benefiting from affiliates in an unfair way. Sure it's in a small way, and in small numbers.

And putting the "ban hammer" on people that support Lucas' findings is even more childish than anything.

You have nice program and great looking sites, just man up dude, and just accept what you've done and being damage report, maybe first of all apologizing to affiliates. And just advise them to promote via your NATS program rather than ccbill, or something man, I know you don't care but some of us see your reaction to this and really is a NOT respectable attitude you care coming out with.

No insults or negativity intended towards, you, I just really think you could have handled this much better.
I dont believe he put the ban hammer on affiliates that support Teencat. He just suggested that anyone who did not like his program should make their way to the exits and he would help them on their way. He even offered to pay their rebills after their accounts were closed. Seems more than reasonable to me.

However when he posted that all this was about 11 active affiliates bringing in a handful a sales per month, I absolutely see why he gets so exasperated with you all.

I see this shit on here (and other forums) all the time, and quite often it is the terminology used that gets everyone riled.

If a business does not succeed (80% of new businesses fail http://lic.me/u/11qwx), then the guys who tried and failed get called "scammers" when not all debts are honoured. I have even seen reputable companies called "scammers" when some fees are requested that the poster did not realise would be charged. I have seen companies accused of spamming when they email some info that a poster has requested, and now a program is forever hindered with the accusation of "shaving" when a billing change over causes a bug.

So spammers, scammers, and shaving; great drama for small time warriors but not particularly professional.

Finally most of you are choosing to forget that our hero Teencat opened multiple threads about this over a period of a few days on more than one forum. Each time RUC asked him to contact the program and he would look into the problem. RUC received no contact whatsoever from the injured party.

So why did he not get in touch and discuss his concerns ?

Did he decide to exchange the odd sale he was making for a great drama thread ?

Can I post this here now ?



and this :

__________________
"Americas Hitler" JD Vance.
“There isn’t really an upside to Trump.” Tucker Carlson.
“a convicted felon rapist is now your president” OneHungLow, gfy.com
NewNick is offline   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote