Quote:
Originally Posted by pornlaw
I did. Like I said, once I filed my case, Pink Visual filed theirs. XBiz did a story about the two cases and the use of 2257 and then it ended.
I caught flack for using 2257 because the industry was fighting against it. I cannot say why no one else is using it but that is what I was told. While no one likes 2257, it's law, it separates us from the issues the music business had in their litigation and it's a powerful weapon. Not only can it be used against tube sites it can be used against the hosts. And if that host is a publicly traded company, it opens up a Pandora's Box of issues for them.
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by bigdave26
To really police the piracy, you'd have to involve
1) Google - Get them to deindex sites that pirate porn
2) Hosts - Get them to take down sites that pirate porn
3) ISPs - Get them to block access to sites that pirate porn
If it sounds like way too tall a task for Google or ISPs, just think that it only takes the deindexing and blocking of the top (illegal) tube sites before shit hits the fan and EVERYONE starts scrambling to comply.
|
If you just put the pressure on the Domain Registrars then the problem can be solved in regards to the piracy sites. No domain no site.
PornLaw, I think one of the things holding people back is the Cash upfront to get started. if the wont see an ROI on the suit, they dont bother.