View Single Post
Old 07-09-2003, 06:32 PM  
malakajoe
Confirmed User
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Sacramento
Posts: 1,751
Quote:
Originally posted by sexeducation


If all I did was collect graphics and present them as a graphics collection - then you would be right.

However, I do not do that - I discuss the graphics/video in the context of the magazine and provide the source of message (graphic or other) being discussed.

In other words ... a newspaper photographer can jump in his car and take a picture of a billboard and publish that "picture of public advertising" in their newspaper.

Are you saying that newspapers can no longer discuss what other newspapers are printing or presenting or advertsing?
I think this guy is onto a great business strategy. Create a sex "newspaper" and use others photo sets but just make sure you write an article about it. Damn, Playboy is doing it all wrong paying bucks for photos. They can just use others and change there format to a "newspaper".

We never have to buy content or pay models again if we follow this. Just think of the possibilities.
__________________
Selfpleasure.com for sale on auction. Closes on Tuesday March 11th at 9pm PST!!!!

Dirty enough to be good, but clean enough for everyone!
------------------------------------------------------------------

Moral Police - First graduating class coming soon! - Forcing our values across the internet
malakajoe is offline   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote