Quote:
Originally posted by sexeducation
No I do not know who this JFPdude is.
Yes - the link you provided is to the Government of Canada law website. The copyright act specifically. I read it - and it is a mumble jumble of legal jargon referencing subparagraphs and exclusions.
On the same website ...
It says I have a right to "free speech".
I intend to quote publicly made statements, in reference to graphics that means content posted in the "free tour" areas.
And discuss those graphics ....
The average of internet pornography is affecting society.
We have much proof of this when you examine the introduction of television into emergining nations. Quite simply - what you see is what you want.
However, the average of internet pornography is NOT how normal people have sex.
There is no such thing as a vaginal orgasm - it is a lie propagated by pornography.
Now don't get me wrong - I am not saying we should not have pornography - I am just saying that we need to do a MUCH better job of teaching HOW TO HAVE SEX.
The proof of this poor record is that 50% of women never have an orgasm and 70% of men complain of premature ejaculation.
|
I can't believe you COMPLETELY glossed over that? What kind of idiot are you, really? It's not just legal jargon, it's all laid out VERY PLAINLY what is legal and what isn't.
Fair dealing for the purpose of research or private study does not infringe copyright.
9.1 Fair dealing for the purpose of criticism or review does not infringe copyright if the following are mentioned:
(a) the source; and
(b) if given in the source, the name of the
(i) author, in the case of a work,
(ii) performer, in the case of a performer's performance,
(iii) maker, in the case of a sound recording, or
(iv) broadcaster, in the case of a communication signal.
and...
29.3 (1) No action referred to in section 29.4, 29.5, 30.2 or 30.21 may be carried out with motive of gain.
(like monetary gain..you had this behind and avs, that's for profit and that's motive of gain)
Does this apply? I don't think so:
Copies of articles for research, etc.
(2) It is not an infringement of copyright for a library, archive or museum or a person acting under the authority of a library, archive or museum to make, by reprographic reproduction, for any person requesting to use the copy for research or private study, a copy of a work that is, or that is contained in, an article published in
(a) a scholarly, scientific or technical periodical; or
(b) a newspaper or periodical, other than a scholarly, scientific or technical periodical, if the newspaper or periodical was published more than one year before the copy is made.
How about this.... I doubt everyone who's "work" you were using was aware of your use... How's this for a definition...
Consolidated Statutes and Regulations
Main page on: Copyright Act
Disclaimer: These documents are not the official versions (more).
Source:
http://laws.justice.gc.ca/en/C-42/38008.html
Updated to December 31, 2002
[Previous]
PART III
INFRINGEMENT OF COPYRIGHT AND MORAL RIGHTS AND EXCEPTIONS TO INFRINGEMENT
Infringement of Copyright
General
Infringement generally
27. (1) It is an infringement of copyright for any person to do, without the consent of the owner of the copyright, anything that by this Act only the owner of the copyright has the right to do.
Secondary infringement
(2) It is an infringement of copyright for any person to
(a) sell or rent out,
(b) distribute to such an extent as to affect prejudicially the owner of the copyright,
(c) by way of trade distribute, expose or offer for sale or rental, or exhibit in public,
(d) possess for the purpose of doing anything referred to in paragraphs (a) to (c), or
(e) import into Canada for the purpose of doing anything referred to in paragraphs (a) to (c),
a copy of a work, sound recording or fixation of a performer's performance or of a communication signal that the person knows or should have known infringes copyright or would infringe copyright if it had been made in Canada by the person who made it.
Knowledge of importer
(3) In determining whether there is an infringement under subsection (2) in the case of an activity referred to in any of paragraphs (2)(a) to (d) in relation to a copy that was imported in the circumstances referred to in paragraph (2)(e), it is irrelevant whether the importer knew or should have known that the importation of the copy infringed copyright.
Plates
(4) It is an infringement of copyright for any person to make or possess a plate that has been specifically designed or adapted for the purpose of making infringing copies of a work or other subject-matter.
Public performance for profit
(5) It is an infringement of copyright for any person, for profit, to permit a theatre or other place of entertainment to be used for the performance in public of a work or other subject-matter without the consent of the owner of the copyright unless that person was not aware, and had no reasonable ground for suspecting, that the performance
DO YOUR RESEARCH. Shall I continue?
I've only hit three sections... there's lots left.