sexeducation

The website is broken. It is broken because I had spent more time with Google.com alogorithms and the homepage then with fixing the code of the "advanced section" and with fixing the code of the "file server/graphic filter".

I have changed and rechanged the website numerous times in an attempt to solidify a constant AVS or CC processor. The "advanced" section and the "file" section have been broken for several months - maybe even - six months.

The advanced section tends to contain the more "controversial" articles like ...
"Die - Faggot - Die" which discusses the ecologoy of AIDS in bathhouses. This article is extremely upsetting to young promiscuous gay men. It was written to be that way.

"Google Gag Gah" contains a censored graphic of a "first page results" link of the search term "bondage". The graphic of the female with her lips sewn shut was captured from the "tour" area of a paid Google.com advertising customer. Because I called this graphic "rape & torture" and NOT "bondage" my advertising campaign with Google.com was terminated. Same graphic - different view of it. It doesn't matter that the website displaying the graphic ALSO used "torture" as a word when describing the event.

"Let Teens Have Sex" contains, what I believe is a very kewl and very unique "lesson/discussion" of all the arguements presented to me over the years for allowing teenagers to have sex. It has a unique ending that "nails" the reader - and promotes abstinence as a mature decision.

the advanced section contains ...

discussion of G-spot stimulation and real female ejaculation discussions.

I have tried NUMEROUS, NUMEROUS marketing methods and was currently in the process of having just the homepage, the tour, "Dad's Desk", a sample Table of Contents and to see the rest you would require AVS access or a paid membership.

I have tried all graphics & video off if you do not have a paid membership.

I have tried showing graphics as thumbnails (really an attempt to comply with AVS site requirements like "30 thumb pictures minimum" ) and requiring an AVS or paid membership to view video.

I have tried not being allowed to save your "viewing preferences" as a manner in which to entice AVS or paid memberships.

I have tried "guaranteed reply" to emails ...

And I have tried combinations of all the above.

I do not "own" Pepsi.com but I do talk about one of their commercials.

I do not "own" Cosmopolitan magazine or "O" Oprahs magazine but I do discuss those magazine and contain samples of the advertising.

I do not "own" Admiral Krags graphics but do present opinions about his graphics (which most have his name on).

I do not "own" Playboy - but will discuss the evolution of Playboy graphics and how Playboy has stayed more "main stream". Usually no close up "vaginal" shots.

I do not "own" Penthouse.com but I have a right to discuss the photograph techniques which seem to be used over and over - like the shining/reflecting of a light on a the females vagina.

I do not "own" Hustler.com but I have a right to discuss the more bizzare graphics like "urination" and "golden showers".

The advanced section contains "The only known cure for premature ejaculation" a link to "http://www.DrMirkin.com"

Currently - I am unsure how I will market SexEducation.com.

Now if you think about it - is there really an "Advanced" section. I don't think so - the whole word "advanced" plays on "I want the one sentence answer to sex. Just give me the good stuff." Is my advanced section really more advanced? Yes - and - no. It's just more discussion - to me. I am not the only online newspaper struggling with how to entice readers to get an online membership.

Do I own the buildings of the photographs I take (for example) of the City of Calgary - no?