View Single Post
Old 07-10-2003, 08:38 AM  
malakajoe
Confirmed User
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Sacramento
Posts: 1,751
Quote:
Originally posted by sexeducation


Semantics really. I expressed my opinion about a Google allowed "bondage" graphic as "rape & torture".

Playboy.com, Hustler.com and PentHouseMag.com have played a historical role is shaping our societies views and morals about sex and are a fair topic for a website about sexual intercourse.

In fact it is from adult magazines like those that personally gave me the impression that a woman could have a vaginal orgasm - where now that I have done research - it appears to be a lie.

They have also fought and defended - for years - free speech, and have had a direct benefit to the protection of an individuals right to such.

What you don't know - is that several "firms/corporations" have requested anonymity on SexEducation.com - and I have honoured each request.

Also - I have previously emailed Playboy.com that I had written about them.

I have ONE PICTURE of a nude minor on my website. She is not engaged in any sexual activity. The child pornography article I wrote several years back - is doing what it is intended to do. Draw attention to the issue. Child pornography has increased 50% year after year - since the inception of the internet. Obviously - ASACP.org is not the final solution now - is it?

The problem with child pornography is that it takes seconds to find it. I get unsolicited emails everyday pushing child porn and beastiality and ... even ... "teen" type sites which fringe on child pornography really.

Yes - I have done research on Child Pornography.
The source of the most controversial graphic on my website was
posted into a "fetish" newsgroup .. and was automatically downloaded by QuadSucker. It is one of 16 graphics - I deleted the other graphics .... and I censored her image.

Many people are accidentally downloading CP when they go into usenet or use P2P software like FileTopia.com or iMesh.com or whatever flavour is most popular today. I wrote that article when it happened to me.
I still haven't heard how and why it is ok to use others pictures and make money of it? Why you feel it is ok to use other content without there permission?

Why does a CP article need a picture or pictures of CP? Does a newspaper that writes about a CP that is caught or a news channel that talks about a CP ring that is busted show the actual pictures or videos? No. You are attracting people looking for CP if you use CP pictures in any type of CP article, for or against. Again, why do you need pictures of it to write about it?
__________________
Selfpleasure.com for sale on auction. Closes on Tuesday March 11th at 9pm PST!!!!

Dirty enough to be good, but clean enough for everyone!
------------------------------------------------------------------

Moral Police - First graduating class coming soon! - Forcing our values across the internet
malakajoe is offline   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote