Quote:
Originally Posted by PR_Phil
because it is you, I get it. You shoot mainly high end pornstars and make them look as hot as possible right? Well the truth is most amateurs are better looking than a high end pornstar. The problem with shooting real pro stuff in 4k is that those are the girls that viewers expect to be perfect, and they will never look perfect at 4k.
Amateurs on the other hand, are often beautiful naturally, and when a viewer watches amateur porn he is fine with seeing a zit or a scar in high definition because he expects it from an amateur. The viewer is looking for something completely different, with the pro stuff it is fantasy, but with the amateur stuff it is about believablity, "I could actually fuck this girl". I know it sounds weird thinking that pro shot porn is more meant for SD while amateur stuff would look great in 4k, but it's the way I feel about it, unless chicks with perfect skin and perfect hair and no acne start doing hardcore all of the sudden.
|
Interesting take on this, pro vs amateur angle. Pro girls tend to be older, and to me at least they have a more hardened look, crows feet, facial skin often more granular. With all the makeup the 4k will see and show all that makeup, and it doesn't look so good to me but guys who love pro might actually like it - I don't know. Weigh in on this guys, who likes the natural look and who likes the plastic look?