Originally Posted by dyna mo

hah, what a fucking joke. I'm embarrassed to be a Cal alum after sifting through the gibberish in that 2nd link. It's clear the "research" was entirely biased just by looking at the 100% negative conclusions- there is not 1 single positive attribute they culled from the psycho study, all the conclusions were negative characteristics, a statistical impossibility.

And I won't waste my time writing about the silliness of doing a psychological profile on a political party based on media articles.