sexeducation:
Quote:
(a) IMAGES CONTAINING SEXUAL ACTS WITH CHILDREN including sex acts with men and young boys ad nausea. There is NO debate on this - it is clearly "child porn".
(b) FURTHER ILLEGAL IMAGES FOR WHICH YOU HAVE NO PERMISSION TO PUBLISH. ie Time Magazine cover. There are NO discretionary rights to do as you see fit - these are illegal images, pure and simple, as defined by international copyright agreements.
sexeducation reply:
A) I have never published any images or video of children engaged in sexual acts. THAT IS A LIE - A COMPLETE - FABRICATION.
B)I am not sure yet whether the Digital Millenium Copyright act forbids me to scan a cover of a magazine and then discuss it's graphic. However, I have been made aware there is a difference between the rights of an online magazine and an offline magazine and require more research into this.
|
I see you are still lying and trying to "debate" the finer points of your "magazine" - this issue is totally irrelevant in relation to the issues of both child porn and copyright infringement.
There is no way on earth you can claim "I have never published any images or video of children engaged in sexual acts". I cannot answer to any adventures you had into the video world, but can assure you YOU ARE RESPONSIBLE FOR PUBLISHING IMAGES OF CHILDREN ENGAGED IN SEXUAL ACTS WITH ADULTS.
In response to para B, I really don't care much about that, (you are just a waste of time!), but I know it IS illegal, not just under the Digital Millenium Act.
Concerning your domain names for sale - that is a joke!! You could not pay me to buy any of them - especially since this matter is not finished and they are the subject of concern, as are you and several others, with various law enforcement agencies.
Have a nice day
