07-23-2014, 07:12 AM
|
|
|
It's 42
Industry Role:
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: Global
Posts: 18,083
|
Quote:
... One more reason I feel confident that the D.C. Circuit?s three-judge panel is on the losing end of this tug of war: Obamacare is increasingly popular. One recent survey found that 74 percent of newly covered Republicans are satisfied with the health coverage they?re getting through the law. Throw in newly covered Democrats and independents, and the rate goes up to 78 percent. Do all those governors who refused to set up state exchanges want the people in their state to be stripped of subsidies now? Does the Supreme Court want to pick up this ax and throw it? Surely the answer is no. Let?s count on the D.C. Circuit to come to its senses in the next round. If that happens, and no other full appeals court strikes down this part of the law, these cases will sputter out. As they should. It?s time to stop picking at the statute?s loose threads and move on to a new national project ... http://www.slate.com/articles/news_a...but_the.2.html
http://www.commonwealthfund.org/abou...dation-history
|
Move on already ... How are you personally hurt financially? PERSONALLY and not some politically decisive talking point.
It's pretty obvious who is unhappy about Obamacare ... And it's not people earning a lot of money and living within their means nor is it people netting less than 400% of the federal poverty income getting subsidized ''obamacare'' living paycheck to paycheck and just getting by.
A National Healthcare in the Untied States, whose basic costs are borne by all taxpayers along with a public coinsurance schema that would pay beyond the basics of the National Healthcare is evolving here maybe. Cut out the insurance companies, and their for-profit administration of healthcare, out of the picture entirely -- they can make their money insuring our possessions and not our bodies. The current USA healthcare system delivers a poor performance compared to the successful national healthcare policies of many industrialized nations.
One kicker, only licensed medical doctors can be on the governing board of the new national healthcare. The new national healthcare should not be governed by political appointees. The ''Obamacare'' politically decisive bullshit is pure acrimony.
We get shit healthcare for our money we spend to put it bluntly.
Most people are not pleased at all by the DC Circuit US Appeals Court ruling-- it amounts to technical and politicized hair splitting over a few sloppy words of an enrolled federal act.
http://www.forbes.com/sites/theapoth...for-obamacare/ Forbes is predicting a upholding of Obamacare, flawed as it may be, from the Roberts Court, the current sitting SCOTUS.
|
|
|