Quote:
Originally Posted by crockett
Your table is percentage of the population not actual number of people insured.. Do I really have to explain to you the difference between percentage of the population vs actual numbers?
In 1999 the population was 272,690,813 In 2014 it is 318,434,000. This is the same stupid ass shit the right wing tries to pull all the time by taking cherry picked stats as their proof when they don't even understand what they are talking about.
|
There was nothing cherry picked. I didn't say a word about 1999 other than that graph showed the numbers going back that far.
I was more concerned with recent history. Like starting in 2009 when Pres. Obama took office.
And brother...I've pretty much come to the conclusion that you don't have the intellectual weight to try and tell me a damn thing. You have shown yourself to be an absolute sheep to the Democrat Party.
And just like Chris Matthews...I bet you get a "thrill running down your leg" when you hear Pres. Obama give speeches.
"Cherry Picked" What a goddamned idiotic thing to say.
You sure seem to think "percentage" is the correct way to do taxes instead of actual dollars. LOL
I got some news for you genius: if a higher percentage of the population from 2009 to the first quarter of 2014 had no insurance...the ACTUAL NUMBERS are way bigger than any that you are babbling about from 1999.
You said it yourself. Goddamn the foolishness of this. Why are you deliberately making yourself look so fucking bad?