Quote:
Originally posted by Webby
sexeducation:
I see you are still lying and trying to "debate" the finer points of your "magazine" - this issue is totally irrelevant in relation to the issues of both child porn and copyright infringement.
There is no way on earth you can claim "I have never published any images or video of children engaged in sexual acts". I cannot answer to any adventures you had into the video world, but can assure you YOU ARE RESPONSIBLE FOR PUBLISHING IMAGES OF CHILDREN ENGAGED IN SEXUAL ACTS WITH ADULTS.
In response to para B, I really don't care much about that, (you are just a waste of time!), but I know it IS illegal, not just under the Digital Millenium Act.
Concerning your domain names for sale - that is a joke!! You could not pay me to buy any of them - especially since this matter is not finished and they are the subject of concern, as are you and several others, with various law enforcement agencies.
Have a nice day 
|
More fluff & fodder ...
QUOTE: "YOU ARE RESPONSIBLE FOR PUBLISHING IMAGES OF CHILDREN ENGAGED IN SEXUAL ACTS WITH ADULTS."
That is a lie - a complete fabrication.
Post the textual description of the picture/s OR more preferably post the HEAVILY censored graphic of your evidence.
Continued - libelous slander.
QUOTE: "I see you are still lying and trying to "debate" the finer points of your "magazine" - this issue is totally irrelevant in relation to the issues of both child porn and copyright infringement."
It was explained to me that free speech online has different laws then free speech offline. I admit I may have unknowingly made some copyright violations. I have deleted ALL GRAPHICS - ALL GRAPHICS ... including those licensed from Huslter.com, DavidLace.com, TopBucks.com, and more ... all graphics ... and each and every page I built over the years - will undergo a complete review before reposting.