Quote:
Originally posted by Webby
sexeducation:
Fluff & fodder - you still sexually abusing children and showing your "guests" images of child porn??
When I see a sick fucker like you spouting a load of crap about "free speech" I know you are warped and looking at jail time - all others I knew like you are serving time right now.
On images and your response above... there ain't such a thing as "unknowingly" - the law ain't too keen on idiots taking action out of sheer ignorance (alledgedly) - tis still an offense!
Once again YOU ARE RESPONSIBLE FOR PUBLISHING IMAGES OF CHILDREN ENGAGED IN SEXUAL ACTS WITH ADULTS. This is NOT a lie but a matter of record.
|
NO - IT IS A LIE.
LIBELOUS - UNFOUNDED SLANDER.
I HAVE NEVER PUBLISHED PICTURES OF CHILDREN ENGAGED IN SEXUAL ACTIVITIES.
However, I would entertain a discussion of whether or not a "sex education magazine" would have right to publish nude pictures of minors ...as long as you drop the fluff & fodder and discuss it rationally.
Do you think no where - any where - nude pictures of minors should be allowed ... ANYWHERE?
And if there are places - where nude pictures of minors should be allowed - why there - and not on others?