I
Quote:
Originally Posted by aka123
" Scientists blamed the mutations on the polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs) released from the spill's submerged oil as well as the two million gallons of the dispersant Corexit that BP used in an attempt to clean up the spill."
http://www.foxnews.com/scitech/2012/...spill-effects/
To me it seems that the oil too has something to do about it. And again, that is not cleanup, dispersing is not cleaning. You blame solely "cleanup" and don't even take into account the methods used. You know, there are alternatives to methos used in these oil spills in US. |
1. You are one of the few people here that can engage a hot debate intelligently. Regardless if we agree or not
2. Im not blaming solely cleanup. Here is what i am doing-
I am stating that it is counterproductive to the solution to not have as accurate depiction of the disaster as possible. Because when we do that, and we do that every spill, we exacerbate the problems. Adding to the damage from the actual spill by overcompenasating with clean up efforts that compound and extend the issue.
Oh and that ********** is a self-proclaimed troll so i troll him back.