Quote:
Originally Posted by **********
My comment? It looks promising. Dimitri's approach to the installation is to provide code that the webmaster can insert into their site. I didn't try it, but it looks like a smart idea.
No Lagcam, you are making a mistake. We do not compete with our own customers, we buy and sell live streams from/to them. Your perception of our business model is way off. To post about it here would only hijack Dimitri's thread so instead please contact me directly, or start a new thread if you want to, and I will be happy to explain the business model to you and even give you screenshots or a demo.
|
I know more than enough of your software and you business model Mark. The last thing we need is another thread for you to spam it in. I also know that despite it being quite good software (although Dmitry's is better) as far as I can see nobody has ever built a successful site with it (also unlike Dmitry's software). Why is that?
I know you will, as you normally do, respond with your own livecamnetwork site as being a success, but I mean sites with more than zero online right now, or 2 scheduled to appear later as that site presently has.
Dmitry has sold hundreds of licenses and some very big 500+ online performer sites using his software. My comment is not that he shouldn't have launched this new site, but that he should have done it using a new nick because for me (and I imagine other license holders) it is not a good feeling to see your developer (who has access to your data) launching something that could be construed as being in direct competition with you.