Originally Posted by The Porn Nerd

Much of what you posted is EXACTLY the project I am working on. My tube site will be a "tube with a twist" and it comes from a Program Owner's perspective, not a tube owner's perspective. Will it work and be successful? Perhaps but I will need the help of "the community" at large in order to gain any traction. We shall see. I will most definitely contact you to brainstorm.

(I am going to the EU shows so this project will have to come together later this year but the Goal is to launch by Dec.1)




I think he was referring to 1,000,000 other tube sites filling the cumshot-less void, not necassarily content producers. I agree 100% with you - there's less content now being filmed than ever before. You can see it on the tubes themselves, how many recycled and "old" content is now appearing. This will continue and become a watershed problem in just a year or tow.

Of course, since a tube site's "focus" is monetization in ways that do not help content producers (and said producers not getting a cut of that revenue) we, the Program Owners, are left with trying to find creative ways to monetize the actual content that is monetizing the tubes. LOL

As with most things, trying to "force" a tube site (or any company) to do what's best for you and not them is tricky (and near impossible). So you have to give the tubes an incentive for change because right now they don't really care about Content Partners in terms of overall revenue. It's been stated many times that affiliate sales from CPP's is 4th or 5th on the list of how tubes monetize their traffic. Withholding content in a protest or blockade kind of way will not work. Instead let's try and figure out a way that tubes can make EVEN MORE MONEY with their Content Partners. If that 4th or 5th revenue stream becomes the 2nd or 3rd revenue stream then tubes will want to work even closer with Content Partners. Or that's the theory anyway. LOL