Quote:
Originally Posted by lezinterracial
Oh, sorry Disinfected. Confused you with myleene. Myleene was the one that had a pirate tube site ask for a 2257 to take the video down.
I remember it was posted on gfy a little while back an underage person was on the front page of xvideos for a couple of days. Xvideos hired people to review videos because this had happened before. Xvideos is probably having to be extra careful now.
|
That is one issue, I am talking about JT's thread warning about content partners of xvideos must click a button that they relinquish all rights to xvideos to continue uploading. Part of that agreement, fairly certain, is that they have legal rights to your 2257.
So what robbie said and what I have read I connected these dots and just wondering if it has any merit.
is a means to have age verification really a means to kill "porn" tubes by requiring porn tubes to have the 2257 docs? The loop hole is that mainstream tubes, are not in general, age restrictive? So why would xvideos take such drastic measures as to use legal jargon to own your videos?
I do not think is because makes it harder to take down, I think because something is coming down the pipeline and tubes need to own the videos or else...