Quote:
Originally Posted by lagcam
Totally fucking clueless  |
Just wondering why you say that?
Facto 1: You ridiculed showme69 for being so careless. Letting 2 nono words (sleep) in video titles.
Facto 2: You have (sleeping) girls on cam
Facto 3: You think there is a loophole in the system that allows you to have (sleeping) girls as content and it is OK since no words say (sleeping).
What about all the losers watching these (sleeping) girls who say... are you (sleeping) sexy?
Admit it, it was/is very hypocritical for you to have the gall to tell somebody they are careless, when you are neck deep in the same shit... 10000X worse.
The "intent" of the BRAM violations is to discourage CONTENT that depicts what "they", mastercard, determines indecent. The "words" are simply an easy way to find the violations... the underlying concept of BRAM is to deter the "CONTENT".
If you think you found a loop hole, good luck. Either way, you are a massive hypocrite on a scale of gargantuan proportions.
