Quote:
Originally Posted by shoot twice
I've done a lot of traveling.
Trust me there's people in this world that are either extremly smart, educated, talented and beautiful and sometimes all of the above. But for whatever reason they're not earning that kind of money. In fact many aren't even able to earn enough to feed themselves.
|
what does that have to do with the notion she shouldn't be on as much money she is for the revenue she generates? One has absolutely nothing to do with the other.
Quote:
Originally Posted by shoot twice
Kim Kardashain doesn't represent any kind of extreme intelligence, beauty or talent. What she represents is a culture that's really over fed and over indulged.
|
(i)In your view, and obviously in many others view also. Conversely, she *does* represent extreme intelligence, beauty, or talent, to others. (ii)what does representation of a section of society have to do with her not being worth her income, based on the revenue she generates?
Quote:
Originally Posted by shoot twice
I'm not against anyone making a dollar and I'm not saying we should all try and be like Mother Teresa. But just the same there is such a thing as going too far.
|
going too far with what? your personal viewpoint on - on what, exactly? And you *are* against her making a dollar if it's gained on what your perception of how a dollar should be earned, and your idea of a limit to said dollars based on whether somebody else somewhere else has more brains, beauty, or intelligence, and/or is able to feed themselves.
Why should *you* earn more than some smart guy somewhere in India who is a teacher, or than a romanian nurse, or a roadsweeper in the USA? Or a beautiful woman who is a in a cleaning job? Or... etc.