Quote:
Originally Posted by SylviaMaroon
its a bit different it's about a dating site for ppl who have STD, and their confidential information got shared
what is interesting, that it says it was in the TOS that they were allowed to sue that stuff, and the judge says ppl don't read the TOS
i think a lot of sites counts on ppl not reading the TOS before agreeing to it
|
Yes, at least in the EU people are not supposed to read the TOS thoroughly and this is taken into account in the legislation. So, the TOS is not some bullet proof vest for the seller. Also in general the service has to match with the image it gives/ what kind of service it is supposed to be. Dating site refers to real people communicating with each other with more or less real intentions to meet, etc. If the dating site is full of just bots and workers whose sole intent is to fake being real users, it doesn't match the definition of a dating site, and is thus a scam.
In simple you can't sell caviar that is actually pig shit, and get away with it mentioning with small print that it is actually pig shit. When you go to the store the customer has to be able to safely assume that caviar is caviar and not pig shit.