Quote:
Originally Posted by Doug of Montreal
Admittedly, this is a sticking point. You'd need to look and compare one review to the next... to see if there's some sort of logic being presented. 90 points are set in stone. You either have it or you don't. The rest comes down to placement in the category... usually focusing on content amounts as a base, then up a point or down based on whatever could make a site special.
We list sites that don't pay, as well, but they tend to be smaller sites so you would rarely see them as being able to compete with the production power of a bigger company. It just happens that this usually works in our favor. There's no hiding from that.
|
Yes, but I am saying to the naysayer(s), "So what if you get paid for the reviews". The reviews still tell people what to expect and that's the entire point. I've dealt with you folks for a long time, and I firmly believe the integrity of the reviews is very accurate. As an affiliate, I've used your site to determine starting points on whether a new site is worth promoting. And then when I gain access to the site for promo material, I quickly find that what you reported is accurate. I say job well done.
Quote:
Originally Posted by fuzebox
I think it's obvious to anyone in this business that the review site model is just a filtering landing page. I wouldn't expect anyone to send free traffic to anyone else.
The highest paying and converting paysite with a crappy members area still doesn't stand a chance of getting anything from Rabbits. Their ranking system has integrity  |
Absolutely agreed.
