Quote:
Originally Posted by crockett
Meaning they are actually spending nearly 7 million to house 100 people while the other 100 go back to the streets.. That's the right way to go?
|
that's not at all an accurate representation of the facts.
you completely neglect including all of the efforts spent on clearing out trash and garbage of that 68 acre shithole for ~2 years, providing ongoing food and medical care to the entire encampment over that time as well as many other efforts.
come on crockett, after what you've seen while boondocking USA you can't begin to tell me this is what you think is ultimately wrong with the USA, the fact that the math doesn't add up to you? Like you, I've seen the homeless situation from this angle too.
this is what's right with USA, helping the homeless, regardless of the costs.