Quote:
Originally Posted by L-Pink
For a grand jury to recommend charges/trial there has to be proof of INTENT to harm. "Intent to harm" is much different that poor judgement in the drama of the moment, bad training, poor policy, someones a dumb-ass, or shit just going wrong.
|
So do you think that is what would happen if you or I or any citizen walked up to another person and told them what to do and when the person didn't obey...they ended up dead?
Oh..."it's the cop's job"?
Okay, same scenario: Guy with Down's Syndrome refuses to leave the movie theater. I am the owner. Only I don't call the cops. I decide to handle it myself. I get into a struggle with the Down's Syndrome guy and I kill him by "accident".
Do you think that I will get a Grand Jury and they will decide I don't need to go to trial?
HELL NO.
And it would have been "my job" I was doing in my own business. So how come when I do "my job" I end up on trial for murder. But the cops SEEM to be above the law?
That's the question.
And the easiest and correct thing to do in a "free" country is to immediately release the entire transcripts of all the evidence and testimony that was used in the Grand Jury after they have reached their decision.
All of this "Secret" stuff is what is causing people to not trust the entire system. (and rightfully so)