Quote:
Originally Posted by L-Pink
I don't want to argue the point, I don't know anything about the case. My comment was just about the grand jury, and the grand jury's only job is to look at all evidence and advise if it should go to the District Attorney for further action.
However the District Attorney is the one presenting the case with whatever "tilt" he choses to the grand jury. Which BTW is made up of the same pool of people that provide trial jurors. Everyday citizens.
.
|
Why the heck don't they release the information such as evidence, testimony, etc. to the public AFTER the Grand Jury has made their determination?
Number one...it SHOULD be public. We the people pay for it. It's ostensibly being done in the name of "the people".
So why then are "the people" being told we can't see it?
And number two...sure does seem like it would stop a lot of the reasons for all the violence that comes after these kinds of controversial decisions (that is unless it turns out that the Grand Jury really IS tilted)