Quote:
Originally Posted by AdultKing
Sorry guys, you need to post proof with your accusations in the thread. That's the rules.
|
You're not following the rules, they're simple proof or ban, you have not provided us proof when we asked.
Quote:
Originally Posted by AdultKing
It's convenient how you forget to point out the following.
WDF was a moderator on piracy webmaster forum WJunction.
WDF was banned from WJunction, meanwhile running a piracy webmaster forum of his own, harbouring the likes of Rudy Corella and UltraMegaBit.
|
This is already known, WDF was against filelockers also more so the ones allowing copyright infringement.
UT never linked to piracy nor allowed it to be posted.
Deflection part 1: Robert was just caught running piracy sites and bringing a subject up from 2 years ago which is false.
Quote:
Originally Posted by AdultKing
Both of you posted and reposted hacked sites, data and databases.
|
We never posted anything here, WDF also never posted anything ever, proof or ban.
Deflection part 2: Robert is trying to make us look bad once again when we have done nothing in over a year, our services have been 100% legal and he only brings this up now as he was caught with live piracy sites claiming they were honeypots.
Quote:
Originally Posted by AdultKing
Both of you have been riding the coat tails of this thread, initially trying to "help" then when rejected (as you should have been) you turn and make veiled threats then go on to take any opportunity to bash the Stop File Lockers project and myself.
|
We provide help to multiple Anti-Piracy groups, we share relevant information when needed.
We never wanted to be a part of SFL ever, we supplied data relevant which you have quoted multiple times.
We have never made veiled threats, we exposed you as a pirate "Deflection part 3"
Quote:
Originally Posted by AdultKing
Fact is guys, there's an audit trail for what we have done and it's in our collaboration system. Many of the DMCA agents you mentioned in a previous post are members of Adult IP and they see everything that happens and participate.
|
We asked for proof, where is it? no bullshit "you need to join AdultIP for $2000 to see"
Proof or ban.
Quote:
Originally Posted by AdultKing
As for your childish remarks about the cost of office facilities, we don't run a nickel and dime operation - we're professional and use professional tools.
|
Our remarks were not childish, you moaned you had no money to run SFL in 2013 and that you would shut down if no one donated, you needed $15,000? you have close to $15000 in hardware!!!
Quote:
|
?Unfortunately at the end of September we finally ran out of funds and the resources just don?t exist to keep this effort going any longer. In fact, we now face a deficit in the vicinity of $15,000,? King said.
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by AdultKing
The eight sites we ran to build a paper trail relating to eight large tube sites earned a total of $22.19 over the period since early April that they ran - we had as mentioned earlier intended to run them for a full year - an this is where your story develops holes. Why would we bother to run some embedded tube sites using the API of the source tubes for $22.19 when as you put it we spent exponentially more than that on office equipment ?
|
Nine sites Robert, "9" sites. those sites run ads from your own gtxads network and crakmedia, evidence is posted already, you made money simple.
These sites were honeypots, don't you not understand what a honeypot is?
Quote:
|
In computer terminology, a honeypot is a trap set to detect, deflect, or, in some manner, counteract attempts at unauthorized use of information systems. Generally, a honeypot consists of a computer, data, or a network site that appears to be part of a network, but is actually isolated and monitored, and which seems to contain information or a resource of value to attackers. This is similar to the police baiting a criminal and then conducting undercover surveillance.
|
We ran a honeypot, we're all a sudden criminals when we're not.
"Deflection part 4"
Quote:
Originally Posted by AdultKing
The fact is that unlike you guys, hacking sites and using "alternative" methods is not legal. Proving copyright infringement is evidence based and building evidence takes time and effort as well as forensic documentation of events. Something you guys don't seem to do very well.
I am not a pirate, so keep painting myself and the project and Adult IP in any light that you like - you will not stop us.
|
We have not hacked a single site since the company was formed, we even posted in this thread that had stopped upon the registration as an LLC. again deflection part 5...
UT was built for evidence, we collected and shared this data with multiple company's.
Everything was logged on UT for the whole year, daily backups, daily logs, images, all logged.
Deflection part 6 ^
You called us pirates for running a honeypot, you're running multiple honeypots now with actual pirated content, we never once had illegal content on UT.
You're lying, all the information is posted public for all to see. many are agreeing already.