Quote:
Originally Posted by TrashyGirl
News article I read said it was:
9 mm Smith & Wesson M&P Shield semi-automatic handgun
...which has a 6.5 pound trigger pull
Gun specs and photos |
Here is the reasoning
Why have a thumb safety on an M&P Pistol!
Quote:
Why have a thumb safety on an M&P Pistol!
Why would anyone want a thumb safety on an M&P so now bear with me on this? The M&P like the Glock is a striker fired weapon and there is no hammer to strike the firing pin which could possibly fire if the weapon were to be dropped but there is no hammer on an M&P!
While I do have one M&P that does have one just like my old model 59 it also has a mag disconnect the same as my model 59 but I bought it for a good price and don't even use the safety as it is unnecessary.
The only way a striker fired weapon will go off is if the trigger is pulled and with the cantilever or two stage trigger design that M&P has this almost has to be a purposeful act.
I own 5 M&P's 7 if you count the .357SIG barrels I have for my 40c and 40 fullsize and all are always fully loaded at all times even in the safe. I have had a Model 59 since 1982 and the same is true with it and it nor any other weapon has ever gone off without me pulling the trigger. Now I do chamber a round in them all and with the model 59 since it has a hammer I do engage the safety and disengage when ready to fire the weapon, it is natural as I am sure thumb safety is with those that carry the 1911 type weapons.
Can someone come up with a good reason to have a thumb safety on a striker fired weapon, I would sure like to hear it because I can see no logical reason for one in the first place!
|
And this:
Why have a thumb safety on an M&P Pistol!
Quote:
If a striker-fired pistol was truly safe, nobody would be able to shoot themselves with one, but we all know that people do. I understand that some people need to carry a pistol in condition 1, but most of us really don't. I've heard all the arguments and I still don't buy them. If someone wants a thumb safety on their M&P, so be it.
There are still 10 commandments of shooting safety, keeping a semi auto pistol in condition 1 at all times is a violation of 1 or more of them. Period. Same for the older "cocked and locked" carry method for DA pistols. When did it become okay to ignore the rules of shooting safety? Who was it that decided this was okay?
Nobody asked me, but this is my opinion.
__________________
|
The inside story of how an Idaho toddler shot his mom at Wal-Mart - The Washington Post
I guess she chose the option to buy the handgun with no safety for the above reasoning.
(a fatal one). When you have young children and are a responsible adult -- you make the safe choice always. That irresponsible choice cost her her life, and traumatized her son for life. Happy New Year.