Originally Posted by TheSquealer

I still get a chuckle when i think of the thread where you actually attempted to argue that you weren't biased towards the left at all and attempted to try to argue that you were right in the center (maybe thats just a normal Canadian pussy thing). THAT was some good stuff. Unintentional forum comedy at its best. You both are at the far end of the spectrum and deny it. You have to deny it to rationalize your strong emotions towards "the other side" as being righteous and correct. The alternative is the realization that you are exactly everything you hate in the other.

Here is exactly why i'm better than you and crocket_science. I understand my bias. I accept that i'm biased. I don't attempt to spend day and night arguing against every point of "the other side" because I understand that i'm biased in my views. Being biased, i understand that I am not objectively interpreting the facts and that I am not seeing the exact same things/facts/concerns etc "the other side is". I understand they are equally biased towards their views, making agreement nearly 100% unlikely, all the time. I like pointing things out sometimes just to annoy you guys and remind you of what you are and that there is another side of the story that you are 100% blind to, because you have tunnel vision.

You clowns act like God himself comes down from the heavens to hand you the latest facts on "the other side" and that your views are always 100% correct and that you are infallible. It's amusing that you can be so lop-sided and then consider yourself to be a person that really loves science. Proof again, that science is often more about faith than fact as one can always find a way to argue their side no matter what the facts are and facts can be interpreted in many ways by someone who's will is bent on interpreting them in a way that supports a predetermined belief.