GoFuckYourself.com - Adult Webmaster Forum - View Single Post - journalist hypocrisy: the pen is mightier than the sword, but we will cry like little bitches...

pimpmaster9000 · 01-09-2015, 07:24 AM

Am I the only one to laugh at the humor of the situation with all this "I am charle" crap?

my first problem with the media is that its not free at all, lets take the killing of 11 professional trolls in paris who, now cry mommy but fully knew what could happen even after the got death threats, as an example...

the truth is boring...something along the lines of: crappy paris "newspaper" could not find better ways of making money or being "journalists" other than to provoke people to the point of getting death threats and then 2 retards gun them down

the truth is not profitable...sensationalist headlines on the other hand are very very profitable...

heres a nice profitable "journalistic" version of the event: artists and heroes gunned down by islamic terrorists! shock! outrage! I am charlie! buy our papers!

all media is guilty of this...TV, newspapers everybody...the media is not free...they are in no way shape of form "independent"...they depend on $$$...the more bullshit you spew the more $$$ you make the more of the market you capture...

now lets go back to the "the pen is mightier than the sword"...we all believe in this in one way or another...keeping in mind that journalists are professional "pens" why do they act outraged or surprised when they use something mighty and get hit back with something less mighty?

journalists have started wars indirectly...just feed the population enough fear and bullshit and they will be ok with shit like iraq getting invaded over 9/11 even though saddam had nothing to do with it whatsoever and its a huuuuuuuge source of amusement to me more than a decade later

in all seriousness: the US army goes after any media in a war zone...the newspapers are the first to be bombed because the army realizes the power of the media...

all the "I am charlie" crew knew fully well, probably better than anybody else, that muslims take their religion very seriously and that what the "artists" from the broke paris magazine were doing was very very wrong...it was right up there with them westboro baptist nutjobs that troll funerals for dead soldiers crazy...

why do journalists expect the muslim community to denounce the acts of the extremist mulims, but they glorify broke racist "artists" and "comic makers" who used "Free speech" to insult the beliefs of 1/4 of the planet? how insulting is LOL its like asking the muslim community to accept the insults to their religion as "Freedom of speech" and not desperate trolling from no talent losers...

does anybody else find this journalistic hypocrisy amusing?

its like "shock and awe! elecrtical engineer dies from touching the elecric socket with a heavy copper wire even though he has a master thesis on how stupid it is to put a copper wire in the socket!"

01-09-2015, 07:24 AM
pimpmaster9000 Too lazy to set a custom title Industry Role: Join Date: Dec 2011 Posts: 26,732	journalist hypocrisy: the pen is mightier than the sword, but we will cry like little bitches... Am I the only one to laugh at the humor of the situation with all this "I am charle" crap? my first problem with the media is that its not free at all, lets take the killing of 11 professional trolls in paris who, now cry mommy but fully knew what could happen even after the got death threats, as an example... the truth is boring...something along the lines of: crappy paris "newspaper" could not find better ways of making money or being "journalists" other than to provoke people to the point of getting death threats and then 2 retards gun them down the truth is not profitable...sensationalist headlines on the other hand are very very profitable... heres a nice profitable "journalistic" version of the event: artists and heroes gunned down by islamic terrorists! shock! outrage! I am charlie! buy our papers! all media is guilty of this...TV, newspapers everybody...the media is not free...they are in no way shape of form "independent"...they depend on $$$...the more bullshit you spew the more $$$ you make the more of the market you capture... now lets go back to the "the pen is mightier than the sword"...we all believe in this in one way or another...keeping in mind that journalists are professional "pens" why do they act outraged or surprised when they use something mighty and get hit back with something less mighty? journalists have started wars indirectly...just feed the population enough fear and bullshit and they will be ok with shit like iraq getting invaded over 9/11 even though saddam had nothing to do with it whatsoever and its a huuuuuuuge source of amusement to me more than a decade later in all seriousness: the US army goes after any media in a war zone...the newspapers are the first to be bombed because the army realizes the power of the media... all the "I am charlie" crew knew fully well, probably better than anybody else, that muslims take their religion very seriously and that what the "artists" from the broke paris magazine were doing was very very wrong...it was right up there with them westboro baptist nutjobs that troll funerals for dead soldiers crazy... why do journalists expect the muslim community to denounce the acts of the extremist mulims, but they glorify broke racist "artists" and "comic makers" who used "Free speech" to insult the beliefs of 1/4 of the planet? how insulting is LOL its like asking the muslim community to accept the insults to their religion as "Freedom of speech" and not desperate trolling from no talent losers... does anybody else find this journalistic hypocrisy amusing? its like "shock and awe! elecrtical engineer dies from touching the elecric socket with a heavy copper wire even though he has a master thesis on how stupid it is to put a copper wire in the socket!"