View Single Post
Old 01-12-2015, 05:15 AM  
Pseudonymous
Photographer/Owner
 
Industry Role:
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Vancouver, Canada
Posts: 2,661
Quote:
Originally Posted by ctggls View Post
I see somehow a difference between what Pseudonymous and Mutt says ... From what I understand from Pseudonymous that it can be quite profitable even in this times to have a solo girl site but from what Mutt says , things are not going so well ... and I think Mutt's Destiny is quite hot ... I like her more compared to other solo models....

Of course, what is "good" and "bad" is different to everyone but strictly speaking from a ROI point of view is quite good to put $10k up front and get $36k or more, that's around 300% ROI ...

Any opinions here?
Mutt launches sites slowly as everybody on this forum knows, he has been sitting on sites for years and years, he needs one site to do pay everything and having one site and sales going down every year, that doesn't work. Its also different because he started this in the prime of things, you can no longer retire off a single website, he also has a photographer as a partner as hes a webmaster. Much different scenarios. People who entered adult in the prime of things have a different view of profit as people in the modern era/mainstream. He is not happy with a 300 percent return. Hes looking at ventures that produce the type of money he was making before. The niche itself is still very profitable, just not enough for him personally
__________________
Previous owner of SoloRevenue
Previous product manager @ Modelcentro.com/MCProfits.com, IsMyGirl.com, SMRevenue.com
Pseudonymous is offline   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote