Quote:
Originally posted by Colin
A large military presence required in Iraq and another high price tag for a war make US involvement in North Korea unlikely. The US military is not real big on manpower and effectively a two theater war would be tough on active personnel. Also,a lot of smart-bomb munitions were used in Iraq that need to be replaced. I also don't think the US will use more of it's political capital in another war so close to the previous one. Major combat activities of the type that can be called a war are usually only fought once every decade or two.
|
see someone trying to make sense without facts. you make good points and logic would say your right but the facts are:
1) If they have nukes that can reach us we will attack them first
2) Mattyd is already over there in Okinawa - they are deploying 100,000 troops all over the Asian theater as we speak
3) we didn't use all of our "smart bombs" in Iraq - we did use a good portion of our million dollar cruse missiles - most of the bigger so called "smart bombs" are surplus WWII dumb bomb with guidance systems added and we have ass loads of them
4) This guy Kim is a freak - he wears American cloths and watches our movies and he's got untested nukes. the point is he needs to be taken out!
5) If Bush wants to take them out it won't be a hard sell - some people in Bushes cabinet thought Korea was a bigger threat then Iraq and think we should have dealt with that first -