Quote:
Originally Posted by mineistaken
To put it simpler for you - quality citizens (those that think that each individual should get what he earns/deserves) votes right, not quality citizens (those who think government should rip off rich and "redistribute to lazies) votes left.
Romney needs more quality citizens and less welfare or lazy types.
So the question is - during those 4 years, did the US economy become better or worse? If better - that means more quality citizens, more voters for Romney and 47% shrinks. If worse - means more welfare and lazy types, less voter for Romney and 47% grows.
|
first off you're agreeing with a false quote, so lets not pretend you are on any intellectual high ground here. second, that is not how people decide to vote in general. third, despite who or what party anyone votes for it DOES NOT change the quality of person they are regardless.
My suggestion is to get rid of your right wing hyperbole generator device and start using real words and maybe someone will start to begin to see your point of view at least.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Squirtit
Right wingers in the porn business 
FTR I'm fiscally conservative & socially liberal so don't left vs right me it doesn't work  |
your ftr is worthless after your first point there because you tipped your actual position..
Quote:
Originally Posted by crockett
Here is my best translation at what mineistaken has to say..
MERICA!!! Ma GUNS!! LIBERALS BAD!!! WHITE PEOPLE GOOD!!!
|
Definitely not far off that's for sure. But as i said, if he stopped using right wingnut propababble and argue a point instead he would at least not sound like a bot.
In the end, all the foreseeable candidates don't seem right for the job from most people perspective regardless of party association I'm sure. Hopefully that can change in the lead up to the next election.