Quote:
Originally Posted by EonBlue
No I am not always right and don't claim to be. But what you and others like you fail to recognize and accept is that there are plenty of well credentialed scientists, physicists, meteorologists and even climate scientists that doubt and refute the man-made global warming theory. These are people who believe that the science is not settled and I just happen to agree with them instead of the unproven claims of the alarmists. That you discount them outright as "shills" to "big oil" is your problem.
As long as there is cause for skepticism, and in this case there certainly is, I believe that being on the skeptical side of the argument is the right place to be. Even though I'm not a scientist I know that that's the way that science is supposed to work.
But hey, you carry on with your juvenile sarcastic attacks, laughing smilies and arrogant attitude. All that shows is that you are not prepared, or equipped, to discuss the subject like and adult.
.
|
The reason we discredit them as "shills" to big oil, is because pretty much all of them are.. It's the same playbook as big tobacco using scientist whom would claim smoking was healthy. I bet if we were back in the 70's, you would be arguing that smoking cigarettes was good for you, because there are a few scientist whom claim so.