Quote:
Originally Posted by dyna mo
right!
and it has nothing to do with your leading, sensationalized thread title-
Another win for big oil in the US
it's not a leap in logic to read this as you having a problem with "big oil". YOu used the term, not me. You didn't simply say hey, another pipeline leak. You didn't say "bridger pipeline owns that pipe" because that didn't fit your anti-big oil narrative.
fyi, bridger pipe own that route. that's some big oil right there!
 |
I don't know why you are trying to make this into a anti oil thing. I've said it many times that I'm not anti oil, but I pro responsibility for them having to pay for and clean up their messes not the tax payers.
Which leads me to the very obvious question.. Why is it you seem to think it ok that tax payers have to flip the bill for these spills? Why are you against these companies being fined when their actions due to negligence help destroy the environment leaving tax players to deal with the problems?
I'm all for "responsible big oil, not so much for negligent putting profits ahead of everything else big oil.. Why is that so hard for you to comprehend?